Showing posts with label rabies. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rabies. Show all posts

Thursday, October 17, 2013

Rabid Bobcat Ambushes Arizona Quail Hunters

Daniel Xu
Hunters may inadvertently draw in bobcats and coyotes when using calls and decoys.
Hunters may inadvertently draw in bobcats and coyotes when using calls and decoys.
Bobcats are generally not thought of as dangerous animals, especially in areas where the larger, far more deadly mountain lion lurks. However, these pint-sized predators can still be a serious concern to hunters in the field.
Two quail hunters traveling near Prescott Valley, Arizona last Thursday were attacked by a bobcat. The unnamed hunters saw the adult bobcat scamper underneath their vehicle and were met with claws and teeth when they investigated. According to the Prescott Valley Tribune, the men suffered severe lacerations and puncture marks across their chest, arms, and back. The hunter who peeked underneath the car received the brunt of the assault and the cat turned on his companion when the other man tried to remove the animal. One of the hunters eventually shot and killed the bobcat.
Bobcats, like coyotes, may be drawn to decoys or bird calls. Since these animals may carry rabies, it is always wise to be cautious while hunting for birds. Hunters bit by bobcats or coyotes are advised to destroy the animal and save the body for rabies testing. The two hunters took the carcass with them to a nearby hospital, where it was picked up by a Arizona Game and Fish employee while the men were being treated. Testing can be finished in only a few hours, and by Friday the bobcat was confirmed to have tested positive for rabies.
Animals with rabies may behave oddly. The best course of action after spotting a potentially infected animal is to call local wildlife officials. Bobcats can also be scared away by loud noises.
Fortunately, treating rabies with modern medicine is much less painful and intensive than it was in the past. Although treatment is now readily available, rabies is nearly always fatal if left untreated and treatment is effective only before symptoms appear. For people who have never been vaccinated against rabies, a series of costly vaccinations must be administered over a two-week period.
The two hunters are now undergoing treatment while wildlife officials put out additional warnings about the increased number of rabies-infected animals. It was the second rabies-related attack in Yavapai County this year.
Edit added 10/17/2013: This article originally stated that the bobcat was shot with a hunting rifle. It has since been changed to indicate that it was simply shot.
File image courtesy Arizona Game and Fish Department

 



OutdoorHub Reporters

Monday, September 23, 2013

Two bats found in L&CC test positive for rabies

Posted: Sep 18, 2013 8:57 PM by Lindsey Gordon - MTN News
Updated: Sep 19, 2013 7:12 AM
 
HELENA - Two bats that came in contact with domestic animals in Lewis & Clark County have tested positive for rabies.
Each of the rabid bats came in contact with domestic animals, but all the animals were current on their vaccines.
One bat was discovered on Harbor Lane and the other in East Helena on Monday.
They were sent to a lab to be tested because it was believed they came in contact with cats and dogs.
Lewis & Clark County animal control officer Sue Hicks believes there has been a higher than typical incidence of bat reports and rabies cases than normal.
For more information on bats and rabies, call the health department at 443-2584.
The health department says that there is a "reasonable probability" of exposure if:
  • A child is found handling a bat or reports that they handled a bat.
  • An adult sees a bat fly near a child and the child reports that "it hit me."
  • A person steps on a bat with bare feet.
  • A bat flies into someone and touches bare skin.
  • A person sleeps out in the open where a rabid bat has been found.
There is little probability of exposure when:
  • Touching fur, wings, or legs of a live bat while looking at it.
  • Touching something that a bat has touched.
  • A bat brushes past someone, but they're certain no contact occurred.
Here are some ways to protect yourself and your family from being exposed to rabies:
  • Never touch a bat. Teach children never to handle unfamiliar animals, wild or domestic, even if they appear friendly.
  • Wash any wound from an animal thoroughly with soap and water and seek medical attention immediately.
  • Keep wild animals out of your home. Secure doors and windows, cap chimneys with screens, and close off any openings in porches, basements, and attics.
  • Make sure your pets are current on their rabies shots. An unvaccinated pet that's exposed to a rabid animal could become a threat to your family.
  • Confine your animals to your property. Pets that are allowed to roam are at higher risk for rabies exposure and infection.

Spanish bat study shines new light on spread of coronavirus


Study of chiropterans on the Balearic Islands helps provide clues about transmission of several diseases to humans
Schreiber's bat
Disease risk – the common bent-wing bat. Photograph: Alamy
Picture this: two men with heavy backpacks, clambering up a mountainside in the middle of August in the Inca area of Majorca, 35km north-east of Palma. Neither tourists, nor hunters, they are actually scientists heading for Ratapinyades cave to catch bats. The aim is to study the viruses they carry.
Bats are suspected of being behind Mers-CoV, a  new coronavirus that is causing alarm in the Middle East. Also implicated in a related virus, which caused the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (Sars) in 2002-03 in China, bats seem to be important reservoir hosts for many emerging or re-emerging viruses.
The viruses have caused serious infections ranging from Ebola fever to measles, through encephalitis and rabies. So gaining a better understanding of the viral profile of bats is clearly important.
Unlike other animals, chiropterans do not die when they catch the viruses, which they can transmit through their saliva or excrement. Jordi Serra Cobo and Marc Lopez Roig, two biologists at Barcelona University, have been studying them since the 1990s, when few scientists paid much attention to bats. They have explored colonies in Catalonia and on the Balearic Islands in an effort to understand the infection dynamic, focusing on rabies, which belongs to the lyssavirus group.
It is often exhausting work. Near Inca, after crossing an almond orchard where sheep were grazing and reaching the end of a track used by hunters, they climbed Puig Santa Magdalena. The temperature was over 30C.
After struggling up a rocky path they finally reached the cave. The entrance had been closed with an iron gate since studies by Catalan researchers and a team led by Hervé Bourhy, from the Institut Pasteur in Paris, demonstrated the frequency with which the bats occupying the cave – numbering about 1,000 at any time – acted as carriers for the rabies virus.
To capture these flying mammals the scientists spread nets and waited patiently in the gloom. With the sheep bleating outside, it was not always easy to hear the squeak of bats trapped on their way out in search of food.
Two days later, at Sa Guitarreta, near Llucmajor, some 30km south-east of Palma, Cobo and Roig carried out another procedure, this time in daylight. Following a dry stone wall, bordering another almond plantation, they climbed down a rockface and entered another cavity. About 25 metres below ground, a tunnel opened onto a great hall, a good 15 metres high.
At first, the only sounds to be heard were the beating of wings. Then, in headlamps, they discovered dozens of bats hanging upside down, while others, perhaps disturbed by the intruders, flew back and forth.
Roig unpacked a great butterfly net on the end of a telescopic pole, rising eight metres into the air. Moving cautiously, because the ground was slippery, he climbed on to a rock in order to reach the ceiling. Once netted – and taking care to avoid any bites – the scientists sorted the animals by species and placed them in canvas bags. The largest had a wingspan of 40cm.
On both occasions, it took no time to catch several dozen samples. The researchers then worked for more than two hours in a sort of a field laboratory, set up on an old car bonnet or a flat rock.
Each specimen was treated in exactly the same way. They were examined to confirm their species and gender, then checked for a possible identification ring. In some cases, a numbered ring was fitted. Since 1995 Cobo's team has ringed 2,600 bat specimens on the Balearics and more than 6,000 in mainland Spain.
The scientists then took a saliva sample using a swab. The bat was laid on its back and its left wing was spread out to allow a blood sample to be taken. At Sa Guitarreta, Cobo also took excrement samples.
The blood samples are centrifuged and deep-frozen, prior to being analysed to isolate specific virus antibodies (lyssavirus or flavivirus, the latter genus comprising the dengue, yellow fever, Japanese encephalitis and West Nile viruses). Ribonucleic acid (RNA), the genetic material of these infectious agents, will be isolated too.
The saliva can also be used to detect lyssaviruses. The excrement may contain signs of coronaviruses and hantaviruses responsible for pneumonia or hemorrhagic fever. The results will take a few weeks.
In its most recent publication, in the May issue of PLoS ONE, the team led by Cobo and Bourhy revealed the ecological factors associated with the prevalence of European bat lyssavirus-1 in the serum of almost 2,400 bats captured in 2001-10 in Spain and the Balearics. The lyssavirus was found in more than 20% of the serum samples, rising to 40% for one particular species.
Virus prevalence peaks in July, in the middle of the breeding season. Above all, the high density of a colony (more than 500 specimens) and the fact that several species lived side-by-side was linked to a high prevalence of lyssavirus.
The bats represent the first link in the chain that transmits the virus to humans, leading to public-health measures such as closing bat caves to restrict the risk of human contact.
However, Cobo and Roig say there would be no point in wiping out bat colonies. "They don't attack humans and act as sentinels for viruses circulating in a particular area. Protecting biodiversity also protects human health," Cobo said. Roig points out that "bats, which must eat between a quarter and half of their body weight daily, have a devastating effect on insect populations, which are also vectors for disease".
To confirm this point the two scientists recall that in 2003 floods on neighbouring Minorca killed many bats, drowned in certain caves. In the aftermath, two parasites thrived, attacking oak and pine trees.
This article appeared in Guardian Weekly, which incorporates material from Le Monde

Beware of Bats


Posted: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:01 am | Updated: 11:38 am, Mon Sep 23, 2013.
MANHATTAN, Kans. (KSVN) -- This is the time of year that bats are most active.
While the winged mammals may seem like a nuisance at most, Two states, Illinois and New Jersey, have both discovered bats with rabies.
As a matter of fact, the winged creatures are the leading cause of rabies in humans -- although these cases are very rare.
And if a pet or human comes in contact with a bat, it can be hard to tell whether or not their at risk for rabies.
"Bats leave very small punctures so sometimes it can be hard to tell if you’ve been bitten or not," Kansas State University veterinarian Susan Nelson said.
Nelson offered the following steps for people to protect themselves and their pets:
  • If a bat is found in the house, it's best to get them removed by a pest company. Avoid any and all contact with the bat.
  • Check for signs that bats may be in the home. Look for holes that are a quarter to one-half inch large. Also be on the lookout for bat dung, which may be on windowsills or the ground.
  • For human bat bites, get immediately doctor assistance. For animal or pet bat bites, get help from a veterinarian.
  • Make sure pets are properly vaccinated, even those that spend most of their time indoors. 
"Unfortunately a lot of cats aren’t vaccinated for rabies because people feel they don’t need it if they live inside," Nelson said. "Well, there’s definitely a need for vaccinating these cats, but if you find one of your pets trying to capture or has contact with one of these bats, that’s another reason to capture the bat and have it tested for rabies."
Find out where to send the bat for testing by contacting a veterinarian or doctor.

Thursday, September 12, 2013

Mers: Deadly coronavirus found in tomb bat


Egyptian tomb bat 
 The sample was found in a faecal sample taken from an Egyptian tomb bat
The deadly Mers coronavirus has been isolated in a bat in Saudi Arabia, scientists report.
The virus was detected in a faecal sample taken from an Egyptian tomb bat, collected close to the home of the first known Mers victim.
The research is published in the journal Emerging Infectious Diseases.
But while scientists found a genetic match, they think it is unlikely that bats are responsible for passing the virus to humans.
Instead they think the virus is spreading from the winged mammals to other animals before it is reaching people.
Another piece of research was recently published in the journal Lancet Infectious Diseases, which suggested that this intermediary animal could be the dromedary camel.
However, only antibodies - the proteins produced to fight infections - were detected in camels, rather than the virus itself, and more work needs to be done to confirm this finding.
'Identical sequence'
The Mers coronavirus first emerged in the Middle East last year.


“Start Quote

In this case we have a virus in an animal that is identical in sequence to the virus found in the first human case”
Dr Ian Lipkin Columbia University
So far, there have been 94 confirmed cases and 47 deaths.
While the virus has been spreading between humans, most cases are thought to have been caused by contact with an animal.
But scientists have struggled to work out which one.
In October 2012 and April 2013, researchers collected samples taken from different bat species found close to the home of the first known victim of Mers.
These were sent to Columbia University in New York. However, the first batch was opened at US customs, and thawed to room temperature. The April batch arrived intact.
Of the 1,000 samples collected, only one taken from the Egyptian tomb bat contained any signs of the virus.
Dr Ian Lipkin, director of the Center for Infection and Immunity from Columbia University and a co-author of the study, said: "In this case we have a virus in an animal that is identical in sequence to the virus found in the first human case."
Narrowing hunt
Dromedary camel  
Researchers are now looking to see if camels and other animals are involved in spreading the virus
The finding suggests that bats could be the origin of the disease, but scientists are looking for another animal that is involved in its spread. Samples taken from camels, sheep, goats and cattle are now being analysed.
Commenting on the research, Prof Jonathan Ball, a virologist from the University of Nottingham, said: "We have long suspected that bats are likely to be the original source of Mers. They've been around for millions of years and have picked up a lot of viruses on the way - bats are a source of lots of human virus infections, like Ebola, henipahvirus, rabies and Sars.
"But there are still some crucial unknowns. They sequenced a very small part of the virus genome - and a highly conserved part at that. We would need to see more extensive analysis involving other more variable genes before we can definitively say the viruses are related.
"Even if this proves to be the case, bats are unlikely to be the source of the continuing Mers outbreaks. Humans and bats just don't interact very much. It's much more likely that an intermediate animal is involved - and finding out what this animal is is key if we are to eradicate this virus before it becomes a bigger problem."
Prof Ian Jones from the University of Reading added: "The surprising overall message is that the bats of (Saudi Arabia) are not awash in the virus, quite the opposite as only one example was found and that appeared to be incomplete.
"The main reservoir for this virus and how it gets to infect people remains unclear at this stage."

Thursday, August 29, 2013

Attacked by wolf, Manitoba woman drives to hospital

Staying calm, Dawn Hepp gets to Ashern, Man., and treatment for injuries

Posted: Mar 18, 2013 9:07 AM CT

Last Updated: Mar 18, 2013 5:19 PM CT

Dawn Hepp shows off the wounds on her neck. Dawn Hepp shows off the wounds on her neck. (Courtesy Dawn 

Hepp)There are puncture wounds on both sides of Dawn Hepp's neck. 

There are puncture wounds on both sides of Dawn Hepp's neck. (Courtesy Dawn Hepp)
A Manitoba woman credits a childhood lesson for saving her life when she was attacked and bitten by a wolf at the side of a highway.
Dawn Hepp was driving along Highway 6 near Grand Rapids on March 8 when she pulled over to help another driver.
When she walked over to the car, a wolf lunged at her.
“His face and his jaws were around my neck … so it was his fur I can feel on my face," she said.
"I could just hear my dad saying, 'stay calm Dawn, stay calm Dawn.' So what I did was I just stayed calm, I didn't yell, I didn't scream.
"He dug a little deeper with that tooth and by the larynx, whether he couldn't get a good enough grip or what, he let go."
At that moment, Hepp jumped into her car and pulled up next to the people in the other vehicle she had stopped to help.
"I rolled down my window and said, 'You guys are OK? I've gotta go. I've gotta get to the nearest hospital,'" she said.
"I just said, 'I gotta get going', and they said, 'Yeah, we were worried about you.'"
Remaining calm, Hepp drove herself to the hospital in Ashern and was treated for puncture wounds and rabies.
Ken Rebizant is with Manitoba Conservation and said the animal could have been hungry or sick.
"It is very rare. I have been with wildlife branch for 25 years, and this is the first case that I have heard of of this kind in Manitoba," said Rebizant.
Grand Rapids is located about 415 kilometres north of Winnipeg.

Teen survives first known wolf attack in Minnesota


Minnesota Department of Natural Resources
A 75-pound gray, male timber wolf was captured by trappers with the U.S. Department of Agriculture after attacking a 16-year-old boy in Minnesota.
A Minnesota teenager who survived a wolf attack over the weekend may be the only person in the state to ever be involved in a mauling from a wolf, according to state officials and local media.
Noah Graham, 16, of Solway, Minn. was camping with friends from church near Lake Winnibigoshish when, while talking to his girlfriend at 4:30 a.m. Saturday, a wolf pounced and bit him in the head.
“I punched it and grabbed it and I couldn’t get it off,” Graham told NBC station KVLY-TV in Fargo, N.D.
Noah Graham, 16, was camping in Minnesota when he was attacked by a wolf last weekend. The animal clamped its jaws around the boy's head, but he managed to escape. Graham is undergoing rabies shots and is expected to survive.
Graham said he kicked and screamed at the wolf before it ran away. He quickly put a blanket on his head to try to control the bleeding while he was taken about 45 minutes to the nearest hospital. That, Graham told KVLY, was the scariest part.
He received 17 staples in his head to close a gaping wound, and a series of precautionary rabies vaccinations.
State wildlife officers believe they shot and killed the wolf that attacked Graham, but they were awaiting DNA. results to confirm it was the same animal. The wolf was also tested for rabies.
Thought dozens of nonfatal wolf attacks have been documented over the years, but there have been only two documented fatal attacks in North America.
In 2010, schoolteacher Candice Berner, 32, was mauled by a wolf in a small Alaskan village.
In 2005, a pack of wolves killed Kenton Joel, a 22-year-old Ontario engineering student, in the woods of northern Saskatchewan, according to government wolf experts.
Graham said the weekend’s attack has changed his views on camping.
“I probably won’t sleep outside again,” he told a KVLY reporter.

Wolf attacks on humans

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Two of the Wolves of Périgord, on display at the chateau of Razac, Thiviers
 
A wolf attack is an attack on a human by a wolf or wolves. Wild wolves are naturally aggressive but are generally cautious enough to occasionally appear timid around humans. Wolves usually try to avoid contact with people, to the point of even abandoning their kills when an approaching human is detected, but there are several reported circumstances in which wolves have been recorded to act aggressively toward humans.
Compared to other carnivorous mammals known to attack humans in general, the frequency with which wolves have been recorded to kill or prey on people is much lower, indicating that though potentially dangerous, wolves are among the least threatening for their size and predatory potential.[1]

Causes and types

Attacks due to provocation have occurred, usually involving shepherds defending their flocks, though none recorded fatalities.[1] Unprovoked attacks by non-rabid wolves are rare, but have happened. The majority of victims of unprovoked healthy wolves tend to be women and children.[1] Historically, attacks by healthy wolves tended to be clustered in space and time, indicating that human-killing was not a normal behavior for the average wolf, but rather atypical behavior that single wolves or particular packs developed and maintained until they were killed.[2]
Habituation is a known factor contributing to some wolf attacks which result from living close to human habitations, which can cause wolves to lose their fear of humans and consequently approach too closely, much like urban coyotes. Habituation can also happen when people intentionally encourage wolves to come up to them, usually by offering food, or unintentionally, when people do not sufficiently intimidate them.[1] This is corroborated by accounts demonstrating that wolves in protected areas are more likely to show boldness toward humans, than ones in areas where they are actively hunted.[3]
Hybridization among wolves and domestic dogs is thought to result in animals which though possessing the predatory instincts of wolves, show a dog-like lack of timidity toward humans.[1]
The majority of fatal wolf attacks have historically involved rabies, which was first recorded in wolves in the 13th century. Though wolves are not reservoirs for the disease, they can catch it from other species. Wolves develop an exceptionally severe aggressive state when infected and can bite numerous people in a single attack. Before a vaccine was developed, bites were almost always fatal. Today, wolf bites can be treated, but the severity of rabid wolf attacks can sometimes result in outright death, or a bite near the head will make the disease act too fast for the treatment to take effect. Unlike healthy wolves, which typically limit themselves to attacking women or children, attacks by rabid wolves are made at random, with adult men being killed on occasion. Rabid attacks tend to cluster in winter and spring. With the reduction of rabies in Europe and North America, few rabid wolf attacks have been recorded, though some still occur annually in the Middle East.[1] Rabid attacks can be distinguished from predatory attacks by the fact that rabid wolves limit themselves to biting their victims rather than consuming them. Plus, the timespan of predatory attacks can sometimes last for months or years, as opposed to rabid attacks, which usually end after a fortnight.[1][2] Much like some big cats,[4] old or crippled wolves unable to tackle their normal prey have also been recorded to attack humans.[5]

Patterns and methods

A recent Fennoscandian study on historic wolf attacks occurring in the 18th–19th centuries showed that victims were almost entirely children under the age of 12, with 85% of the attacks occurring when no adults were present. In the few cases in which an adult was killed, it was almost always a woman. In nearly all cases, only a single victim was injured in each attack, although the victim was with two or three other people in a few cases. This contrasts dramatically with the pattern seen in attacks by rabid wolves, where up to 40 people can be bitten in the same attack. Some recorded attacks occurred over a period of months or even years, making the likelihood of rabies infected perpetrators unlikely, considering that death usually occurs within two to ten days after the initial symptoms. Records from the former Soviet Union show that the largest number of attacks on children occurred in summer during July and August, the period when female wolves begin feeding their cubs solid food. Sharp falls in the frequency of attacks were noted in the Autumn months of September and October, coinciding with drops in temperature which caused most children to remain indoors for longer periods.[5]
People who corner or attack wolves typically receive quick bites to the hands or feet, though the attack is usually not pressed. In both rabid and predatory attacks, victims are usually attacked around the head and neck in a sustained manner,[1] though healthy wolves rarely attack frontally, having been shown to prefer to attack from behind.[5] Some specialized man-eaters have been recorded to kill children by knocking them over from behind and biting the back of their heads and necks.[6] The body of a victim from a healthy wolf attack, is often dragged off and consumed unless disturbed.[1]